A “yes” vote supports this amendment to require a two-thirds vote by the electorate to enact, extend, or increase local special tax initiatives and prohibit local jurisdictions and ballot initiatives from enacting ad valorem property taxes, except for voter-approved bond debt-service taxes authorized elsewhere in the state c…Read More

A “no” vote opposes this initiative to amend the California Constitution to prohibit the enactment of:

• new taxes after January 1, 2026, on ownership or control of retirement holdings, individually-owned assets, and other forms of personal savings, and
• retroactive taxes that result in a tax liability based on conduct, activities, or a st…

Read More

A “yes” vote supports this initiative to amend the California Constitution to prohibit the enactment of:

• new taxes after January 1, 2026, on ownership or control of retirement holdings, individually-owned assets, and other forms of personal savings, and
• retroactive taxes that result in a tax liability based on conduct, activities, or a st…

Read More

A “no” vote opposes this initiative to require an audit for state laws or ballot initiatives levying new special taxes after January 1, 2026.

Erica Olivo Reynoso, a licensed vocational nurse at Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center and a member of SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West:

“Props. 41 and 42 were put on the b…

Read More

A “yes” vote supports this initiative to:

• require pre-election audits of tax-related ballot initiatives that have collected 25% of required signatures, with audit results included in the voter information pamphlet for any measure that qualifies for the ballot;
• require state laws or ballot initiatives levying a new special tax enacted a…

Read More