• A “no” vote opposes this initiative to require an audit for state laws or ballot initiatives levying new special taxes after January 1, 2026.

     

    Erica Olivo Reynoso, a licensed vocational nurse at Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center and a member of SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West:

    “Props. 41 and 42 were put on the b…

    Read More

  • A “yes” vote supports this initiative to:

    • require pre-election audits of tax-related ballot initiatives that have collected 25% of required signatures, with audit results included in the voter information pamphlet for any measure that qualifies for the ballot;
    • require state laws or ballot initiatives levying a new special tax enacted a…

    Read More

  • A “no” vote opposes this initiative to levy a one-time 5% tax on the accumulated wealth of taxpayers and trusts with covered assets valued over $1 billion, including shares of capital stock, bonds or other evidences of indebtedness, and any legal or equitable interest, to fund state health care programs, food assistance programs, and public e…Read More

  • A “yes” vote supports this initiative to levy a one-time 5% tax on the accumulated wealth of taxpayers and trusts with covered assets valued over $1 billion, including shares of capital stock, bonds or other evidences of indebtedness, and any legal or equitable interest, to fund state health care programs, food assistance programs, and public e…Read More

  • “no” vote opposes this ballot initiative, leaving existing law in place, under which:

    • voters are not required to present a government-issued ID when voting; and
    • voters must attest to their citizenship under penalty of perjury and provide identifying information when registering; election officials are not required to use government dat…

    Read More

  • Load More Posts

Verify your email

We'll send a verification code to .

Gift this article